|
Various activists in the climbing community have contributed the comments below:
Guy Robertson
The bottom line for me is that climbers will and should decide what's acceptable / desirable by going and climbing the routes in question. From a 'traditionalist' perspective, the future may well be bleak – just look at the state of most Dubh Loch E5+ routes, and consider this against the bumbling crowds at Benny Beg or Rock Dust on a nice sunny Sunday. The Ramp pitch on The Needle, Shelterstone Crag (E1; VIII,8), another recorded 3 star mountain rock climb. But it is disjointed and ledged with loose rock in places. Is this acceptable as a winter line? Are its neighbours 'Steeple', 'The Spire', 'Haystack' or even 'The Pin' also fair game? Are peg scars from winter ascents acceptable even though they may reduce the enjoyment of future summer ascents?
Simon Richardson Despite this vibrancy I sense the winds of change. The inevitable consequence of higher participation levels is greater commercial pressure on the sport. For the first time ever we have professional Scottish climbers. Supremely talented, they are obliged to stay at the forefront of the sport with a continuous series of publicised new developments to satisfy their sponsors. To match technical standards elsewhere in the world there are pressures to create bolted mountain sports climbs and pre-protected continental style mixed routes. Scotland is a very special place. We have some of the wildest and most empty countryside in Europe. Away from the popular areas, it is possible to go hill walking all day and see nobody else. It is possible to climb on countless crags in the Northwest that only a handful of people have ever visited before. It is possible to study a map, find an unclimbed sea stack and then go and climb it. But it's not just the wilderness that provides Scottish adventure. We are blessed with a landscape comprised of ancient rocks. Solid and weathered, cracked and featured they form corries, crags and sea cliffs that readily accept protection and are made for on sight climbing. We have no need to mimic climbers in Europe and North America who are largely driven by the quality of their rock to bolt and pre-protect their crags.
Bruce Poll I am of the feeling that ground up on-sight climbing of terrain harder than Scottish technical 8/9 in full winter condition (i.e. iced up rocks or powder covered everything) is approaching a self-limiting grade because finding and placing protection becomes inherently harder because of the extreme body tension this climbing involves (reaching for gear is enough to make you slip off). Placing pegs in this position is impossible. In summer a new line on a mossy crag, normally involves prior cleaning, it is a bit hard to clean the snow off before climbing a route in winter hence the need for more pre-placed protection. I do not think that natural Scottish winter lines need bolts as they still tend to follow relatively obvious lines, and weaknesses normally yield the odd placement. I feel there are climbers around capable of climbing harder but are limited by current ethics. They can climb M10+ abroad on cleaner rock with pre-placed protection, unfortunately Scottish ethics does not allow them to climb this hard here, or at least scorns them when they do. It would be a shame if Scotland becomes a soft option. As steeper lines are climbed, their very nature means that they will hold less snow, so rather than have to wait for a specific wind direction to cover an overhanging route with a dusting, lets just climb them and let it be accepted as developing the sport to European levels of difficulty. I appreciate summer lines but for several years now I have seen no one climbing summer lines in Coire na Ciste on the Ben, but many hundreds have climbed up there in winter. The Ben is not alone in its apparent desertion of summer climbers. I believe that to further develop climbing into the steeper mixed ground, prior placement of essential gear and route inspection become more accepted. The routes still need to have some snow on them or icy bits which I believe are the more normal winter conditions for Scotland. For this reason I think a policy of dry-tooling only in low level quarry style venues be continued. Classic summer lines should be avoided.
Niall McNair A fair number of young climbers nowadays will be getting introduced to climbing through walls and then sport climbing outside. This of course means that there will be a greater demand for lower grade routes. But at the same time with such a large number of new climbers developing their skills in this manner without opportunities to develop Trad climbing skills, then I fear that in the future a large number will not understand or appreciate traditional based climbing or venues. A sensible, enforceable policy should be developed to protect those venues. Already, interest in Trad climbing seems to declining as the "Old-Timers" have done everything and younger climbers would prefer to boulder or sport climb in trendier areas as dictated by the grit-centric magazines. This seems a real shame as Scotland has so much to offer in terms of adventure and sheer variety of venues.
Scott Muir
In winter we are challenged by the weather. All the cliffs that regularly freeze fall into a very small height band (500-1000+) so suitable winter sport crags are mountain crags. Venues like Lower Ben Udlaidh, would provide excellent sport style mixed crags that would not detract or interfere with the traditional winter lines on the main crag and offer a fantastic new resource. The 'feel' as the MCofS suggest of a crag indicates a very good way to determine the style of climbing on a crag. The 'in-condition' issue is so blurred that it leads to hypocrisy on the part of many climbers with a “say one thing-do another” mentality. The adage 'if its easier to climb with winter gear, it's in condition' is probably the best advice. However, cleaning snow off 'in-condition' routes causes extreme rock damage with unnecessary scraping, Hoar and rime does 'not' protect the rock! The desperate mixed routes of the future will be impossible under a regulatory plastering. Damage reduction would be best achieved by an increase in climber's skills and techniques, rather than the current thrashing approach often witnessed. The idea that winter only lines are the way forward for cutting edge routes is misplaced. They don't provide quality summer lines because they are vegetated and discontinuous. The 'very' hardest routes of the future will seek out blank, protection-less and sustained rock at a high angle that may never be totally 'white'. Either the climbing of all established mountain summer routes is fair game in winter, as in the past, or they are not and that needs deciding rapid style. I hope winter routes of the future will use a variety of honestly reported styles and tactics; on-sight will remain the Queen of all ascents; routes that follow established summer climbs will either be shunned, or be open game under appropriate conditions for the route (the only rule being that all vegetation must always be frozen); sport mixed routes will become acceptable in certain locations; and we'll all enjoy our life of climbing.
John Mackenzie I don't claim to be a cutting edge rock jock or Grade 10 steel clawed guided muscle (alas) but do love my climbing, in particular in Scotland. After 40 years of doing this rather dotty activity I have to ask myself why it is still so darned attractive. Now I love sports climbing too and think that limestone is a wonderful rock to climb on especially when it's not raining, which it rarely does at the Costa's. But would I really enjoy a lifetime of following bolts up a wall, rather similar to another wall on another crag. I wonder. However I do continue to enjoy climbing a natural line on varied rock and take pleasure in finding and placing gear (preferably not too far apart). Now it may not be as difficult as the gleaming bolt ladder, but somehow its more ultimately satisfying. Likewise, on one of those (increasingly) rare winter days when the ice is plastic or the turf epicurean, what better than the satisfying thunk of picking and sticking your way up some great feature on that 'Ben'? Would it be the same if you were heading for fixed gear? Possibly not. Now I'm referring to routes up to E4 and Grade V1, where the majority go. Beyond is not really my province to comment on; however I'll try. This is where attitude comes in; what are you doing it for? Is it worth careful consideration of the (obviously) unprotected lead before doing it, judging the mores of the locality, the rock type, the season etc or is it worth doing at any cost to the rock, you, or others feelings? In other words “it's not what you climb but how you do it what matters”. But if Scotland is largely adventure climbing, surely there is room for bolted compromise in some areas, if that is what the local view wants. However few would be happy with a scratched and pegged classic left after a winter siege; this would be pleasing yourself at the expense of the many. Gritstone (a rock I love) is not bolted but limestone often is and there are good reasons for that. Solid metamorphic or igneous rock, usually well cracked, is bolted only as a measure of last resort. Sometimes it is better to top-rope practice and declare it honestly and take the consequence rather than place that bolt, sometimes it isn't - it depends on the situation. But, and it is a big but, Scotland has a special feeling of place, so don't ruin it for the future, keep some virgin rock for those steel-digits of the future together with their as yet unthought of protection.
Andy Nisbet So what should the dry-toolers climb? It would be easier if Scotland wasn't so well developed for rock climbing. First come, first served as they say. And bolting up the lines? This isn't so easy. The snag with bolts is that once you feel safe, you've lost half the spirit of leading, so you might as well top-rope. And then it just becomes a matter of strength, which is great if you're strong and proud of it, but rather boring if you're not. So climbing these big roofs on the Continent is boring? OK that's rubbish and I've gone round in a circle, so bolting must be acceptable in the right place, just like summer. But Scottish crags aren't that exciting, so we need to add in some extra challenges, like trying to find some snow and ice in a globally warmed world. Climbing unfrozen turf? There's no doubt it does damage. But should we try and control it? I don't think so, mostly because it isn't practicable. Any mid-level route will have some unfrozen turf, and any low level route will have more. The backs of the ledges rarely freeze even in the high Cairngorms. As long as we are aware that the route will change if the turf is pulled out, and be as careful as we can, not to. Fortunately, climbing unfrozen ground is harder than climbing frozen, unlike dry tooling versus snowy.
Neil Shepherd “Last great problems” on crags with a strong trad background should not be bolted. Newly discovered crags, or those with some old diff scramble, which have been subsequently forgotten, are fair game as sport crags. I disagree with minimalist bolting, but feel retro bolting should be allowed with 1st ascentionist permission on crags that become accepted sport venues. All pre-practice on new trad routes should be reported honestly, including even trying the odd move on abseil inspection as too often “checking the route” turns into a full-scale practice of hard moves. Red pointing trad is ok again as long as it's declared. Esoteric gear such as filed down nuts and skyhooks should also be clearly stated and hammered gear should not be used on trad routes. This would mean a ban on pegged routes, especially of the pseudo sport variety (i.e. Dalriada). Winter bolting presents a difficult issue, but perhaps should be governed by the same rules as summer except allowance made in the case of high mountain crags that have no summer value or history as trad venues. Winter ascents of summer classics should only be done without hammered gear and ascentionists should attempt to minimise rock damage.
Neil Shepherd on FA 'Rubbing Salt into the Wound' F6a+, The Elephant, Arbroath sea cliffs. In most parts of the UK sea cliffs have traditionally been regarded as adventurous venues, whether loose north Devon Culm, or pristine Lundy Granite. The development at Arbroath broke that mould in Scotland to the dismay of some climbers, as much as the bolting on Lundy by Gary Gibson did in England. Local activist Neil Shepherd was responsible for earlier traditional routes, but felt the generally unprotectable, slightly sandy, small-pitch nature of Arbroath meant it was more suited to sport routes.
Neil Morrison
Wilson Moir I am more into movement now. Sport climbing, deep-water soloing and bouldering are much more fun than sitting on a belay ledge for ages, or scaring yourself to death. I would like to see more sport climbing in Scotland, on sea-cliffs or anywhere that there is overhanging quality rock which is unsuited to trad climbs. In the meantime I will keep visiting Spain and France for the vast number of brilliant sport routes they provide. I still enjoy trad climbing where flowing movement is possible and continue to visit many areas in Scotland but I would like to see more quality sport venues in the country, instead of the, often inferior routes on scrappy/poor rock we have to contend with. Crags like Ceuse and Makinodromo would be good! I think bolting has evolved in a common-sense way. Locally (Aberdeen) there are sport routes in quarries and on sea-cliffs that are deemed unsuited for trad routes. Fine. I would like to see some of the futuristic pieces of rock bolted on the coast, especially if it were to raise standards and, from a personal viewpoint, provide myself and friends with long-term but achievable goals.
Gordon Lennox
Karin Magog
Steve Crowe I don't think that sets of long and detailed rules are really of any use but open and frank debate is essential if we are to protect this great resource for future generations. Steve Crow on FA (on-sight) of Gun Fhaimh (E6,6a), Ardnamurchan. A serious and loose conglomerate sea cliff which epitomises adventurous style climbing. Most of the routes have been done (or attempted) on-sight. Would it have been bolted had it been 'discovered' by those with an interest in sports style only? Who is best experienced to make that initial decision? What is it about the crags 'feel' that makes this an unsuitable sport venue? |
|
This page is part of the old website of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland. To visit the new website, click on www.mcofs.org.uk |
[ Home ] [ News ]
[ Safety and Training ] [ Access and Conservation ] [ Sports Development ] [ Council Matters ]
[ Search ] [ Info Service ] [ Membership ] [ Publications ] [ Newsletters ] [ Links ]