
|
The University Club Safety and Good Practice weekend in April was cancelled predominantly due to Foot and Mouth and ….umm, well, we didn't get any interest 'on paper'. I say on paper, because after we cancelled it quite a few club organisers phoned or emailed to say that they had a number of club members interested. That was great news but you gotta let us know earlier!! Dully bureaucratic as it is, you do need to register interest and give a firm commitment – names, requirements etc. - as we need to know in advance for accommodation, food and staffing needs. But all is not lost. The weekend will run on November 24th - 25th, that time running up to the end of the year when you are waiting for the Christmas parties to happen and the winter routes to come into nick. It will be a weekend of practical activity, with some chalk and talk thrown in – aimed at club members and those with positions of responsibly within university clubs, as well as staff that might oversee clubs, such as Safety Officers. Not just climbing clubs, but walking clubs and mountaineering ones as well. The cost will be £15 per person per day; camping is £3 a day and self-catering, but can choose to eat and sleep at the Lodge for a more princely sum. Ask your student Association or Student Union if they can help subsidise some places – persuade them it is in their interest in this litigious world that clubs have access to cheap, quality training and advice. Even without a subsidy it is great value for money and you will have access to the Lodge facilities for free during the weekend, as well as expert advice, instruction and a good crack.
|
First Aid Course 2001 |
ACCESS and CONSERVATION
Errata:
Access LegislationSpreading the WordThe MCofS 'Road Shows' held across Scotland in June by Mike Dales and John Donohoe helped brief members on the draft Bill, and to encourage responses. The quality of debate was very high and helped MCofS in its response and hopefully increased the number and quality of individual responses. We would like to thank Tiso for their support and sponsorship, the Ochils Mountaineering Club and Climb Caledonia for helping to arrange local venues, and the Scottish Canoe Association for jointly organising the Perth briefing. MCofS also alerted the Outdoor Trade to the possibly devastating effect on their business and would like to thank The Outdoor Industries Association for their help in spreading the word. Finally, thanks to all those mountaineers and clubs who made submissions.
The MCofS Response The MCofS regarded The Draft Bill as a great disappointment, ignoring the Access Forum's proposals, to draft legislation that was confused and unworkable. One of the main principles behind the devolved Scottish Parliament was to be the preparation of draft legislation by "Civic Scotland" and the Forum was regarded as the embodiment of that process and the MCofS is still committed to the process of bringing together the recreational bodies, land managing interests and public agencies via the Forum. The general statement from the MCofS was that the legislation should more closely reflect the consensus recommendations of the Forum:
So, where do we go from here? The MCofS submitted that the draft Bill was so far off target that the draft stage should be repeated and the public be given an opportunity to be consulted on a more sensible set of proposals. Land reform legislation is central to the Scottish Government's agenda, unfortunately, civil servants have now knocked it off course, and a number of politicians are now aware of this fact. There has been media speculation that the "Access" and "Community and Crofters' Right to Buy" sections of the legislation might be de-coupled with the "Right to Buy" allowed to progress more quickly, whilst "Access" is given more time to be re-drafted. This is a possibility but unlikely as most politicians feel there is no space in the Parliamentary timetable. The other option for the Scottish Executive is to write legislation and a draft Scottish Outdoor Access Code that reflects the consensus view and sensible and balanced package of measures that the Forum published in November 1998. MCofS will be lobbying MPs to take those proposals seriously. Most importantly, we will urge the politicians to make it their priority to get this legislation right, as this is far more important than the date when the Bill is passed. Access SymposiumWhere Next After the Draft Land Reform Bill?Saturday November 17th The AK Bell Library Theatre, Perth As a follow-up to the Access Briefings, this year's Access Symposium will debate the ongoing process of access legislation reform in Scotland. Given the anger that the draft Bill has generated, this is an opportunity to hear the latest news and help guide MCofS's reactions. Your support during the recent consultation period was tremendous, but there is more work to be done. This is a crucial issue and we urge members to attend this event.
National ParksMCofS Cairngorms National Park Consultation ResponseThe full MCofS response to the written consultation exercise can be found on our website, or alternatively a paper copy can be ordered from our office (A5 SAE please). We were concerned that the consultation paper did not explain what the current problems are that could be addressed by a National Park. Without this appraisal of where we are now and how we arrived here, it is difficult to plan our way forward. Our overriding concern is on the issue of planning powers. We believe passionately that the National Park should be its own planning authority. To have a National Park with the various local authorities holding onto the planning powers is a policy that has been demonstrated not to work. The experience of English and Welsh National Parks should serve as a reminder. The first two National Parks in the British Isles were the Peak District and Lake District. Both started out with the National Park being the planning authority, but the next eight Parks, all created in the 1950's, had the planning powers vested in the local authorities. Planning issues were more properly and efficiently dealt with in the Peak and Lakes, and years of campaigning for all Parks to be their own planning authorities finally succeeded in 1995 with the passing of the Environment Act. Are we about to copy that mistake? The MCofS expressed its concerns that the government will wish to see Scotland's first two National Parks working effectively before it agrees to further National Parks. We believe that other parts of Scotland meet the criteria for a National Park, but their chances of achieving this designation could be set back if one or both of the first two Parks runs into problems. We believe that problems are far more likely to occur in the Cairngorms if it, unlike Loch Lomond and the Trossachs, does not have control of the planning powers.
Loch Lomond and the Trossachs National Park draft Designation Order Copies of the consultation document can be obtained by phoning the Stationery Office Bookshop on 0870 606 55 66 or by e-mailing npb@scotland.gsi.gov.uk (or here) The MCofS's initial reaction to this document is that we are pleased to see the National Park controlling the planning functions in respect of the local plan and development control. In terms of the boundary we are pleased to see the Argyll Forest Park and Loch Earn included within the Park, but feel that more of Glen Dochart should be included than is currently proposed.
Snippits
Hillphones Posters and leaflets will be found in shops, information centres, hotels and cafés throughout Scotland and a leaflet is enclosed with this newsletter. Please contact the MCofS office if you can display a poster or want more leaflets. In the aftermath of FMD and the unjustifiable attempts at maintaining closures, and following the disappointment of the badly drafted Access Legislation, the Hillphones scheme demonstrates that ordinary people on the ground can work together and communicate sensibly.
Foot and Mouth Disease Conference
Loch Duntelchaig Parking
Masts Mobile telephone companies were sheltered from the main planning system as masts were designated as "permitted development". The MCofS has campaigned for the removal of this status since 1998. We are pleased that the Scottish Executive has acted, but unfortunately, in many areas the damage is now done with bulldozed tracks leading to hill top masts. Under the previous planning arrangements masts under 15 metres in height were permitted, but from July 2001 onwards all ground based masts will require planning permission. The Scottish Executive news release announcing this change in the planning rules can be found at: www.scotland.gov.uk/news/2001/06/se1534.asp
Proposed Shieldaig Hydro Scheme
|
|
This page is part of the old website of the Mountaineering Council of Scotland. To visit the new website, click on www.mcofs.org.uk |
[ Home ] [ News ]
[ Safety and Training ] [ Access and Conservation ] [ Sports Development ] [ Council Matters ]
[ Search ] [ Info Service ] [ Membership ] [ Publications ] [ Links ]